CPU_PUSH_WORD((sp), funcaddr>>8); \
} while (0)
+ /*
+ * If the kernel is in idle-spinning, the processor execute:
+ *
+ * IRQ_ENABLE;
+ * CPU_IDLE;
+ * IRQ_DISABLE;
+ *
+ * IRQ_ENABLE is translated in asm as "sei" and IRQ_DISABLE as "cli".
+ * We could define CPU_IDLE to expand to none, so the resulting
+ * asm code would be:
+ *
+ * sei;
+ * cli;
+ *
+ * But Atmel datasheet states:
+ * "When using the SEI instruction to enable interrupts,
+ * the instruction following SEI will be executed *before*
+ * any pending interrupts", so "cli" is executed before any
+ * pending interrupt with the result that IRQs will *NOT*
+ * be enabled!
+ * To ensure that IRQ will run a NOP is required.
+ */
+ #define CPU_IDLE NOP
+
#else
#define CPU_PUSH_CALL_CONTEXT(sp, func) \
CPU_PUSH_WORD((sp), (cpustack_t)(func))