From a7b32862181b24557fdad586a17b49fc9366b620 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jameson Graef Rollins Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:58:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] add comment to bug. --- ...up-subcommand-for-monkeysphere-server.mdwn | 27 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/website/bugs/setup-subcommand-for-monkeysphere-server.mdwn b/website/bugs/setup-subcommand-for-monkeysphere-server.mdwn index c491f8b..a074d9e 100644 --- a/website/bugs/setup-subcommand-for-monkeysphere-server.mdwn +++ b/website/bugs/setup-subcommand-for-monkeysphere-server.mdwn @@ -27,3 +27,30 @@ Would either of these be useful? Are they confusing? Could they be clarified? --dkg + +--- + +I'm not sure how I feel about this idea. I feel like it should just +be the job of the package to setup the initial server environment. I +don't really feel like the admin should have to worry about it. But +then again, I can sort of see it from the point of view of someone +just installing from source (but who the hell really does that +anymore anyway?). + +I'm also sort of mixed about the setup --full idea as well. At first +I thought that it wasn't a good idea, and that I didn't like the idea +of monkeysphere monkeying around with the config files of other +packages (ie. ssh). However, once I started to think about setting up +monkeysphere on lots of servers, I started to think that it's maybe a +good idea. It might be good to have a single command that would just +end with the server being on the monkeysphere: + + * generate the server key + * modify sshd to point to it + * restart ssh + * publish the key to the keyserver + +So I'm starting to think that this might be a good idea. Also curious +what other think. + +-- jrollins -- 2.25.1