X-Git-Url: https://codewiz.org/gitweb?p=wiki.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=FlossContributionFAIL;h=a3d503c5e7ca4b10516465a69a5603e9a6c9566b;hp=f11ca4cbfb5732f84c1ca166baa5557714c2e684;hb=1964dc1a47341c4f549e1c044a7fab3ef9469876;hpb=1f000f9b85eece202b2ef783f666baf2d45eef4d

diff --git a/FlossContributionFAIL b/FlossContributionFAIL
index f11ca4c..a3d503c 100644
--- a/FlossContributionFAIL
+++ b/FlossContributionFAIL
@@ -1,16 +1,19 @@
 == How to tell if contributing to a FLOSS project is doomed to FAIL ==
 
 === Contributor License Agreements ===
- * Your project requires a CLA: 10 points of FAIL
- * The CLA donates code to a for-profit who competes with potential contributors: +50 points of FAIL
- * The CLA doesn't give full rights on the contribution back to the contributor: +100 points of FAIL
+ * Your project requires a CLA [+10 points of FAIL]
+ * The CLA donates code to a for-profit [+20 points of FAIL]
+ * The CLA donates code to an entity whch competes with other potential contributors [+50 points of FAIL]
+ * The CLA doesn't give full rights on the contribution back to the contributor [+100 points of FAIL]
 
-=== Review process ===
- * Code review process is not documented [+10 points of FAIL]
- * Current review process differ from documentation [+5 points of FAIL]
+=== Code review process ===
+ * Review process is not discoverable nor documented [+10 points of FAIL]
+ * Current review process differs from documentation [+5 points of FAIL]
  * Simple patches require the agreement of multiple maintainers [+20 points of FAIL]
  * Review process requires filing a ticket in a bug tracker for each patch [+20 points of FAIL]
  * Patches must be reviewed in a bug tracker [+50 points of FAIL]
  * Patches must be thrown at a review system or mailing-list, without naming a specific reviewer [+100 points of FAIL]
- * Large portions of your code base have no designated maintainer [+50 points of FAIL]
- * A clear maintainer exists, but is inactive, unresponsive or unwilling to review patches [+100 points of FAIL]
+ * Large portions of your codebase have no designated maintainer [+50 points of FAIL]
+ * The core maintainer is rude / offensive / abusive (aka a "jerk") [+50 points of fail]
+ * A clear maintainer exists, but is inactive or unresponsive [+100 points of FAIL]
+