X-Git-Url: https://codewiz.org/gitweb?p=wiki.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=about;h=17c38d46ba1691906c2f8b21a10c94876a5c947c;hp=ab156d1bd1309a2219593d7e75d4dabb2178a371;hb=20e5061beaabdc06ed23b019d29f99cec187eb93;hpb=7dcd164f40fdb48b3cee92a82b91d835e829996b

diff --git a/about b/about
index ab156d1..17c38d4 100644
--- a/about
+++ b/about
@@ -23,11 +23,14 @@ online identity to services whose conditions are established and changed unilate
 The [[http://opendefinition.org/ | definition of open knowledge]] is still a subject of
 discussion. At this time, I tend to boycot those online web services that make it
 intentionally hard bulk access to data created collaboratively by their users.
-Examples of badly behaving sites are [[http://www.imdb.com | IMDB]] and
-[[http://flickr.com | Flickr]].
+Examples of such badly behaving sites are [[http://www.imdb.com | IMDB]] and
+[[http://flickr.com | Flickr]]: both have been created by us, but try downloading
+substantial portions of their data, if you can. On the other end of the spectrum,
+the [[http://wikipedia.org | Wikipedia]] provides an interface to dump the
+entire database, including the history of edits. This is what we should demand
+from any online resource built collaboratively.
 
-My current personal policy is to use these services in read-only mode, without
-helping them collect even more information.
+My current personal policy is to use those non-reciprocal services in read-only
+mode, thus avoiding to grow their information base with my help.
 
-Call me a fundamentalist for going through these hoops, but I believe I'm acting in
-my best personal interest. I //do// care about my meta-self, and you?
+Promoting users' autonomy is in the long-term interest of a free Internet.
\ No newline at end of file